Skip to content
Business Tax

FICA tax rules for nonqualified deferred plan annuity payments

Thomson Reuters Tax & Accounting  

· 5 minute read

Thomson Reuters Tax & Accounting  

· 5 minute read

Information Letter 2017-0012

IRS has issued an information letter on the FICA tax rules with respect to nonqualified deferred compensation plan annuity payments.

Background—nonqualified deferred compensation plans. A nonqualified deferred compensation (NQDC) plan is an arrangement between an employer and an employee to pay the employee compensation in the future. NQDC plans are generally unfunded arrangements. This means the employer’s promise to pay the deferred compensation benefits in the future is not secured in any manner. An inherent feature of nonqualified deferred compensation plans is the risk that an employee may not receive any benefits in the future.

NQDC arrangements are either account balance plans or nonaccount balance plans. A nonaccount balance plan does not credit deferred amounts to a particular participants’ individual account. (Reg. § 31.3121(v)(2)-1(c)(1)(i))

Background—FICA taxation of NQDC plans. Generally, wages are subject to FICA tax (Social Security and Medicare tax) when they are actually or constructively paid (see Code Sec. 3101 and Code Sec. 3111). However, a special timing rule allows an employer to withhold the employee share of FICA tax, and pay the employer share of FICA tax, on amounts deferred under a NQDC plan as of the later of: (1) the date on which the employee performs the services that create the right to a deferral; or (2) the date on which the amount deferred is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (Code Sec. 3121(v)(2))

Nonaccount balance plans are subject to a special rule that allows an amount deferred under a nonaccount balance plan to not be taken into account as FICA wages until the amount deferred is considered “reasonably ascertainable.” The amount deferred is “reasonably ascertainable” on the first date on which the amount, form, and beginning date of the benefit are known, so that its present value can be computed. (Reg. § 31.3121(v)(2)-1(e)(4))

Taxes or other amounts which an employer is required or authorized to deduct and pay to the U.S., a state or any political subdivision of the U.S. or a state don’t reduce the amount of wages for FICA purposes. (Code Sec. 3123)

Facts. A taxpayer is receiving annuity payments under a NQDC nonaccount balance plan. The employer paid both the employer and employee FICA taxes on the present value of the NQDC benefits in the year he began receiving distributions under the plan. The taxpayer is concerned that the employee share of FICA tax on the present value of his NQDC benefit was included in his income.

The employer handled things properly. IRS first said that the employer had properly computed both the employer and employee share of FICA tax on the annuity payments in accordance with federal law and regs. IRS also stated that the employer was correct to include in the employee’s income the employee share of FICA tax on the present value of his nonqualified deferred compensation benefit. IRS cited Code Sec. 3123 and noted that amounts withheld from an employee’s wages for the employee share of FICA tax are treated as paid to the employee. As a result, the amount withheld by the employer as the employee share of FICA tax should be included in the employee’s income.

IRS also pointed out that this situation is different from the situation where the employer pays the employee share of FICA tax out of its own funds instead of withholding it from the employee’s wages. In that situation, the employee must include in income both the amount that the employer should have withheld as the employee share of FICA tax and the additional amount paid by the employer out of its own funds.

In addition, IRS noted that the intent of Code Sec. 3121(v)(2) is to impose FICA tax on amounts deferred under a NQDC arrangement when the amounts become vested in the employee (that is, not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture). The fact that the employee later receives less than the amount originally deferred (or ultimately receives nothing at all) does not give the employee a right to a refund of the FICA taxes paid on amounts deferred.

References: For the special timing rule for NQDC plans, see FTC 2d/FIN ¶ H-4635 ; United States Tax Reporter ¶ 409A4.04 .

More answers

EBSA Highlights Its 2023 Enforcement Results

Fact Sheet: EBSA Restores Over $1.4 Billion to Employee Benefit Plans, Participants, and Beneficiaries  Fact Sheet News Release The DOL …