Skip to content
Individual Tax

Supreme Court won’t review start date of 30-day levy notice period

Thomson Reuters Tax & Accounting  

· 5 minute read

Thomson Reuters Tax & Accounting  

· 5 minute read

Weiss v. Comm., (CA Dist Col 5/22/2018) 121 AFTR 2d 2018-1853, cert denied 12/03/2018

The Supreme Court has declined to review the DC Circuit’s affirmance of a Tax Court decision that, for purposes of determining whether IRS has met the requirement in Code Sec. 6330(a) that it notify the taxpayer by mail no less than 30 days before the date of a levy that the taxpayer has the right to a collection due process (CDP) hearing, the 30 days is measured from the mailing date of the IRS notice.

Background. IRS generally may not levy against a person’s property or right to property unless it gives the person a notification in writing of his right to, and the opportunity for, a pre-levy CDP hearing with IRS. (Code Sec. 6330(a)(1)Reg. § 301.6330-1(a)(1))

One way in which that notice may be made is by sending the notice by certified or registered mail at least 30 days before the day of the first levy with respect to the unpaid tax for the tax period. Hand delivery within that same time frame is also allowed. (Code Sec. 6330(a)(2))

Facts. The taxpayer was Mr. Weiss. In an effort to collect Weiss’s unpaid tax liabilities by levy, IRS attempted to hand-deliver the notice at Weiss’s residence during a field call on February 11 but, deterred by Weiss’s dog, was unsuccessful.

Two days later, IRS initiated the mailing of the notice by certified mail to Weiss’s last known address. IRS did not generate a new levy notice dated February 13 but rather enclosed in the envelope the original notice dated February 11.

The taxpayer challenged the timeliness of the levy notice in the Tax Court.

Tax Court decision. The Court held that the mailing date, February 13, was the relevant date from which the 30-day period was measured. (See “Taxpayer failed in attempt to run out limitations period on collection.”)

Circuit Court affirmed. The Circuit Court for the District of Columbia, affirming the Tax Court, has held that the mailing date, February 13, controlled the issue. The Court reasoned that the statute looks to the date the notice is sent; in the context of a mailed notice, “sent” means “mailed.” (See “30-day period between notice and levy begins on notice mailing date.”)

No further review. On Dec. 3, 2018, the Supreme Court refused to review the DC Circuit’s decision. Accordingly, that decision is now final.

References: For collection due process hearings with regard to levies, see FTC 2d/FIN ¶ V-5255United States Tax Reporter ¶ 63,304.

More answers

Tenth Circuit Holds That ERISA Preempts Oklahoma PBM Law

Pharm. Care Mgmt. Ass’n v. Mulready, 2023 WL 5218138 (10th Cir. 2023) Available at The Tenth Circuit has held …